top of page

Loading Post

Olivia B

Apr 9, 2025

3

min read

Regenerative Agriculture: Healing Soils to Heal the World

Regenerative agriculture offers a new way to restore soil health worldwide.

Regenerative Agriculture: Healing Soils to Heal the World

“Regenerative agriculture” is a concept we often hear, but what does it mean and what does it do? To understand its aims, we must first understand soil and its place in the environment. “Soil” and “dirt” are terms often used interchangeably, but they differ in critical ways: put simply, soil is alive while dirt is dead, and we are turning the former into the latter at a high rate. This is concerning and potentially catastrophic for our environment and economy, so the difference is worth exploring in more detail.  


Soil vs. Dirt

Soil is a structured, complex, thriving biosphere that supports and promotes all manner of life. Its fertility comes from organic matter that hosts a variety of microorganisms, which in turn create stability in this tiny ecosystem by absorbing carbon, recycling nutrients, and supplying vital resources like water and gas. A healthy soil might take thousands of years to form. It’s also the planet’s second-largest carbon sink, topped only by the oceans. 


Dirt, meanwhile, is composed of clay, sand, and silt. The minerals it contains are only accessible to plants once they’ve been processed by microorganisms. Soil might contain dirt, but dirt is not enough to support life on its own. Soil becomes dirt through degradation, which removes its fertile properties and releases its trapped carbon into the atmosphere. In short, soil is a precious and increasingly limited resource. 


Soil Degradation: A Global Problem

Alarming metrics are everywhere: Earth's soil is vanishing. According to the FAO, fully a third globally has already degraded. UNESCO projects that 90% of the planet's terrestrial surface could be degraded by 2050. From 2015 to 2019, 100 million hectares were lost annually, totaling an area twice the size of Greenland over those four years. Impoverished areas disproportionately carry this burden: today, Africa bears 40% of our degraded soil, and the rest mostly occupies communities already afflicted by food insecurity.  


Poor land management and harmful farming practices over the last century are largely responsible for this damage. For instance, monocropping, growing a single crop year after year, degrades soil by continuously diminishing the same nutrients, killing the microorganisms that could replenish them. Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides like fumigants can also be lethal to soil dwellers (and detrimental to human health, as well). Heavy farm machinery and excessive tillage cause soil compaction and erosion, which hinders water absorption and filtration and makes the land more susceptible to flooding and desertification. Unsurprisingly, this leads to dire consequences not just for the environment but for human livelihoods, and the economy: one study estimated that damage from soil erosion alone globally costs $400 billion per year.  


The American Dust Bowl of the 1930s is one potent example of soil degradation’s very real perils. Drought, heat, and corrosive farming methods resulted in severe soil erosion on a massive scale, leading to dust blizzards in the Great Plains that devastated entire states and impoverished millions of people during the Great Depression. The lands affected have still not fully recovered nearly a century later. To avoid repeating history, something must be done to reverse degradation, and here regenerative agriculture enters the picture. 


Restoring Soils with Regenerative Agriculture

Where past sustainable farming has focused on simply avoiding degradation, regenerative agriculture aims to not only prevent further damage, but also actively improve the quality of the earth. It strives to offer a holistic approach, starting with the soil but also accounting for the plants, animals, and workers, essentially building agroecosystems that form a mutually beneficial relationship with nature rather than a purely extractive one.  


In the micro, regenerative agriculture revitalizes soil by reintroducing organic matter, prioritizing the biodiversity of its inhabitants, encouraging water absorption, and restoring ground nutrients. In the macro, regenerative practices lead to carbon recapture, healthier and more robust crops, less food insecurity, and more economically bountiful yields.  


So, what methods does regenerative agriculture use? There are many. Cover cropping maintains soil quality by ensuring the earth is never bare, which decreases erosion during the non-growing season. Intercropping (the practice of growing multiple crops in the same place simultaneously), rotational grazing by livestock, and crop rotation add nutrients to the soil, disrupt pests that thrive on monocrops, and increase yield as well as populations of beneficial bacteria. This allows farmers to use fewer pesticides and synthetic fertilizers, which further keeps soil microbiomes diverse and thriving. Agroforestry protects crops from wind and water damage. Limiting excessive tilling and heavy farm equipment keeps soil absorbent and aerated, potentially garnering greater yields that would eclipse efficiency gains created by those tools. 


Many of these methods have long been used by small farms and Indigenous peoples. Native American tribes, for instance, practiced intercropping with the “Three Sisters”: beans, squash, and corn. Now that regenerative agriculture is gaining wider traction, however, we could revolutionize food systems on a global scale — healing soil, boosting economies, and making the future more fertile for all.


Want to learn more? On May 7, the Global Impact Collective will host our next Community Networking Event at Tactile Studios and bring together a panel of regenerative agriculture experts. Join us for a deep discussion of motivations and challenges to adopting regenerative practices, the use of technology, how impact is being measured, the role of policy/standards, and the importance of partnerships and collaboration between businesses and farmers. We hope to see you there!

Agriculture

Recent Posts

Women's History Month 2025: Five Women Who Shaped Our Food Systems
Food Waste Prevention in the Pacific Northwest: Three Expert Perspectives
Embracing the Second Era of Sustainable Sourcing

The Revolving Door Problem: Internal Alignment is Critical Before Pursuing Partnerships

  • Writer: James Bernard
    James Bernard
  • Dec 12, 2023
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jan 4, 2024

How many times have you visited a partner organization only to find out that others from your organization have just met with the same people? It happens all the time. Several years ago, I was waiting in the lobby of a well-known government institution waiting for a meeting I’d scheduled to talk about potential partnerships. I looked up and was surprised to see two colleagues from my organization leaving the building at the same time – figuratively I was going in the revolving door as they were coming out! I flagged them down and learned that they’d just met with a team that was adjacent to the one I was waiting to see.


This posed several obvious problems. First, we potentially wasted people’s time because we hadn’t coordinated our schedules, which is not a great way to engender confidence and trust with the partner. Second, because we weren’t coordinated on our messaging and pitch, we risked sowing confusion about what we could really bring to the table, therefore weakening our negotiating position. Finally, being disorganized damaged our reputation as an organization that could be relied upon to deliver on a partnership.


In that case, my colleagues and I quickly recognized that we were putting our partnerships and organizational reputation at risk. We compared notes in the lobby and salvaged our relationships by building a more unified approach for future meetings. No real damage was done, and in fact, we created a stronger partnership by working together.


The Revolving Door Problem is extremely common in big organizations, even if you don’t literally run into colleagues in the lobby. I recently met a sustainability director who had been approached by no fewer than three representatives from the same NGO about developing a partnership. He was lamenting to me that he wasn’t sure which team had the lead or should be relied upon to deliver on a partnership.


The challenge often begins with a lack of role clarity or ownership of key relationships with prospective partners. Responsibility for social impact partnerships is often distributed through a large organization at both the HQ and field levels. At a company, it might sit in the CSR group, a marketing team, a product team, or procurement organization. At an NGO, it can sit with individual project teams, in business development, or as part of a strategy function. At government agencies, responsibility could be shared across any number of offices at HQ or the field.


So, how can organizations avoid the Revolving Door Problem, or at least minimize it?


First, internal coordination is key. Before anyone at an organization engages with external partners, it’s critical to have a clear understanding of what you want to achieve through a partnership, how that partnership would advance the objectives of your organization and the partner, and who should approach prospective partners.


Second, make sure you have a thorough understanding of the organization(s) you are approaching. What partnerships have they done in the past and how did they originate? Are there different divisions or business units within the partner that might have different goals in a partnership? Who have been the champions of cross-sector partnerships at the organization?


Finally, map out what your organization can bring to a partnership. Determine the key assets that might have value to another organization – these could be expertise, access to stakeholders, channels, credibility, funding, or content. Decide how these assets can be complimentary to the partner, and how they might be valued. Is there a timeline for execution of the partnership, and how would you see it being managed? How are you going to measure your results?


Some larger organizations have developed a partnership account management structure, similar to what you might see in a fundraising, business development, or sales function. In this model, it’s the responsibility of each account manager to have a complete understanding of prospective partners, their motivations, competitors, industry dynamics, and operations. In some cases, an account manager may handle several partners from the same sector, industry or region. In other cases, when the partner is large or complex (and if staffing allows), a single account manager may be assigned to a single organization. All communications to prospective partners should – initially at least – be run through the account manager and all explorations and meetings should be tracked in a Customer Relationship Management tool like Salesforce or HubSpot.


There’s no question that cross-sector collaborations are challenging and complex, especially if more than two partners are involved. But one way to build a foundation for a strong partnership is to avoid the Revolving Door Problem in the first place.

bottom of page